Why does the old photo remain in my blog after being replaced by a new one?
solve for chess
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• RYXI
  • Сообщества
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

RYXI > Games > solve for chess 19 September 2005 04:01:01

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Модератор:

solve for chess

Entropy 10 September 2005 01:54:34
 
In Matiyasevich's book on Hilbert's 10th problem, there was a passage on
how it was undecidable for a result of a game to be determined from an
arbitrary game. Is it still possible for a unavoidable algorithm/gambit
for a win/loss/stalemat for either black or white to be determined. If
so, what is computational complexity of solving chess?


--
entropy
Add comment
Guy Macon 10 September 2005 14:23:58 permanent link ]
 
Content-Transfer-En­coding: 8Bit


JVMerlino@aol.com wrote:
However, EGDBs are at this time only created for up to 6 pieces on the>board. It's a VERY LONG WAY until we have the answer for all 32 pieces.>It's taken about 6-8 years just to go from 5 to 6 pieces as being the>"state of the art", because of the necessary computation time and>storage requirements.

I wasn't aware of the entire 6 man Nalimov tablebases being completed.
Do you have a source and a hard figure for how many bytes it takes
to hold all of the 3-man, 4-man, 5-man and 6-man Nalimov tablebases?
How long will it take to get to 32 pieces? Even if progress is linear>(and it won't be), at best it's going to take close to 200 years before>chess is solved!

Complete 3 man Nalimov Tablebase...80 kB (measured)
Complete 3+4 man Nalimov Tablebases...30 MB (measured)
Complete 3+4+5 man Nalimov Tablebases...7.5 GB (measured)
Complete 3+4+5+6 man Nalimov Tablebases...1-2 TB (estimated)
Complete 3+4+5+6+7 man Nalimov Tablebases...200-60­0 TB (estimated)
Complete 3+4+5+6+7+8 man Nalimov Tablebase...40-180 PB (estimated)
...
Complete 3+4+5+...+30+31+32 man Nalimov Tatablebases...????­

I welcome any estimates that are better than the ones above,
and I especially welcome anyone who has the courage to give me
an estimate to replace the ??? above. I would also very much
like some data on how long it takes/took to generate each set.

--
Guy Macon <http://www.guymaco­n.com/>




-------------------­--------------------­--------------------­-

BTW, Here is a handy reference for expressing large numbers:

*******************­********************­********************­**

SHORT VERSION:

k kilo- 1.0E+3 x1,000 Thousand(US,UK)
M mega- 1.0E+6 x1,000,000 Million (US,UK)
G giga- 1.0E+9 x1,000,000,000 Billion(US)
T tera- 1.0E+12 x1,000,000,000,000 Trillion(US), Billion(UK)
P peta- 1.0E+15 x1,000,000,000,000,­000 Quadrillion(US)
E exa- 1.0E+18 x1,000,000,000,000,­000,000 Quintillion(US), Trillion(UK)
Z zetta- 1.0E+21 x1,000,000,000,000,­000,000,000 Sextillion(US)
Y yotta- 1.0E+24 x1,000,000,000,000,­000,000,000,000 Septillion(US), Quadrillion(UK)

Note: vendeka, xenna, xenno, and vendeko are bogus.
Before you try using them, please read these pages:
[ http://home.att.net­/~numericana/answer/­units.htm#prefix ]
[ http://home.att.net­/~numericana/answer/­culture.htm#zillion ]
[ http://physics.nist­.gov/cuu/Units/prefi­xes.html ]
[ http://physics.nist­.gov/cuu/Units/binar­y.html ]

LONG VERSION:

*******************­********************­********************­**

NAMED POWERS OF TEN - US VERSION
-------------------­-------------
- N/A 1.0E+36 N/A 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000 000 000 000
- N/A 1.0E+33 decillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000 000 000
- N/A 1.0E+30 N/A 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000 000
- N/A 1.0E+27 octillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000
Y yotta- 1.0E+24 septillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
Z zetta- 1.0E+21 sextillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
E exa- 1.0E+18 quintillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000
P peta- 1.0E+15 quadrillion 1 000 000 000 000 000
T tera- 1.0E+12 trillion 1 000 000 000 000
G giga- 1.0E+9 billion 1 000 000 000
M mega- 1.0E+6 million 1 000 000
k kilo- 1.0E+3 thousand 1 000
h hecto- 1.0E+2 hundred 100
da deca- 1.0E+1 ten 10
d deci- 1.0E-1 tenth 0.1
c centi- 1.0E-2 hundredth 0.01
m milli- 1.0E-3 thousandth 0.001
µ micro- 1.0E-6 millionth 0.000 001
n nano- 1.0E-9 billionth 0.000 000 001
p pico- 1.0E-12 trillionth 0.000 000 000 001
f femto- 1.0E-15 quadrillionth 0.000 000 000 000 001
a atto- 1.0E-18 quintillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 001
z zepto- 1.0E-21 sextillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 001
y yocto- 1.0E-24 septillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-27 octillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-30 N/A 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-33 decillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-36 N/A 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001

Note: vendeka, xenna, xenno, and vendeko are bogus.
Before you try using them, please read these pages:
[ http://home.att.net­/~numericana/answer/­units.htm#prefix ]
[ http://home.att.net­/~numericana/answer/­culture.htm#zillion ]
[ http://physics.nist­.gov/cuu/Units/prefi­xes.html ]
[ http://physics.nist­.gov/cuu/Units/binar­y.html ]

*******************­********************­********************­**

NAMED POWERS OF TEN - UK VERSION
-------------------­-------------
- N/A 1.0E+36 sextillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000 000 000 000
- N/A 1.0E+33 N/A 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000 000 000
- N/A 1.0E+30 quintillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000 000
- N/A 1.0E+27 N/A 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000000
Y yotta- 1.0E+24 quadrillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
Z zetta- 1.0E+21 N/A 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
E exa- 1.0E+18 trillion 1 000 000 000 000 000 000
P peta- 1.0E+15 N/A 1 000 000 000 000 000
T tera- 1.0E+12 billion 1 000 000 000 000
G giga- 1.0E+9 milliard 1 000 000 000
M mega- 1.0E+6 million 1 000 000
k kilo- 1.0E+3 thousand 1 000
h hecto- 1.0E+2 hundred 100
da deca- 1.0E+1 ten 10
d deci- 1.0E-1 tenth 0.1
c centi- 1.0E-2 hundredth 0.01
m milli- 1.0E-3 thousandth 0.001
µ micro- 1.0E-6 millionth 0.000 001
n nano- 1.0E-9 milliardh 0.000 000 001
p pico- 1.0E-12 billionthh 0.000 000 000 001
f femto- 1.0E-15 N/A 0.000 000 000 000 001
a atto- 1.0E-18 trillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 001
z zepto- 1.0E-21 N/A 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 001
y yocto- 1.0E-24 quadrillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-27 N/A 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-30 quintillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-33 N/A 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001
- N/A 1.0E-36 sextillionth 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001

Note: vendeka, xenna, xenno, and vendeko are bogus.
Before you try using them, please read these pages:
[ http://home.att.net­/~numericana/answer/­units.htm#prefix ]
[ http://home.att.net­/~numericana/answer/­culture.htm#zillion ]
[ http://physics.nist­.gov/cuu/Units/prefi­xes.html ]
[ http://physics.nist­.gov/cuu/Units/binar­y.html ]

*******************­********************­********************­**

--
Guy Macon <http://www.guymaco­n.com/>

Add comment
Mark Adkins 19 September 2005 04:01:01 permanent link ]
 


"Mark Adkins" <msadkins04@yahoo.c­om> wrote:
As for the other party which claimed, falsely, in another message, that>I've already seen such proofs "several times", but that I have rejected>them without stating why, I can only honestly repeat that I have seen>no such proof. I can also state that, in attempting to reply to that>party's message, my reply was directed automatically to a "newsgroup">(non-ex­istent, I believe) called "alt.dev.null". What follows are the>full headers of his message (or as full as I can get from Google Groups>(whether still called "Google Groups Beta" or not):

***SNIP***

What do you mean "non-existent?" alt.dev.null is right there on your
beloved Google Groups. See <http://groups.goog­le.com/group/alt.dev­.null>.

Everyone else here can post to alt.dev.null. If you are having trouble,
I suggest that you complain to the administrators who run the internet.
If you need a phone number or email address for them, just ask in the
alt.dev.null newsgroup and someone will be sure to help you.









































































































































.

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
Пожалуйста, относитесь к собеседникам уважительно, не используйте нецензурные слова, не злоупотребляйте заглавными буквами, не публикуйте рекламу и объявления о купле/продаже, а также материалы нарушающие сетевой этикет или законы РФ. Ваш ip-адрес записывается.


RYXI > Games > solve for chess 19 September 2005 04:01:01

see also:
Network Recognition Strangeness…
2.6.8++ mouse problems
How to reduce the screen resolution…
pass tests:
see also:
1.Hello!
2.I.
Welcome!

  Copyright © 2001—2010 RYXI
Идея: Монашёв Михаил.
Авторами текстов, изображений и видео, размещённых на этой странице, являются пользователи сайта.
See Help and FAQ in the community support.ryxi.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.ryxi.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.ryxi.com.
Information for parents.
Пишите нам на .
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .
Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .